| Lord of the Flies (1963) | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
catbox_9 DTF1 ADMINISTRATOR Detroit Tiger
Number of posts : 22295 Age : 37 Location : Paso Robles, California Favorite Current Tiger(s) : Justin Verlander Reputation : 17 Registration date : 2007-10-05
| Subject: Lord of the Flies (1963) Sat Mar 07, 2009 4:09 am | |
| Lord of the Flies is based on the famous novel of the same name. Unlike most novel-based movies, I have actually read this novel. Like the book, this film tells the story of a group of boys aged 6-12 on an uninhabited island during World War 2. Their plane has crashed and they are the only survivors. They attempt to build a society while they await their rescue but the society quickly falls apart. While mostly faithful to the book, this plot played out rather dully while it was vastly superior in the novel.
The film stars a group of people who were not, and still are not, famous. Generally I don't care for children as actors. This film is no exception. The children do a decent enough job, but none of them were even close to award-worthy.
My main problem with this film is the deviations from the novel. While it is expected that a film will deviate from a novel some, the deviations in here seem quite odd. Simon, one of the most important characters in the novel, is fairly irrelevant in this film. His encounter with the Lord of the Flies, perhaps the most important scene in the book, is mostly omitted from the film. To a viewer who is unfamiliar with the book, this film offers no reason as to why it is titled Lord of the Flies whereas the book makes that quite clear. In addition, Roger, another important character in the book, is barely mentioned in this film. The film is a little less violent than the book largely due to the fact Roger is barely involved in this film. There are other notable omissions or changes, but I will not mention any others.
This film goes to show that unless the film is quite famous, films based on famous literature don't generally work. Some of the most important pieces of literature in history (most notably the over 400-year-old Don Quixote) have never been given a decent film adaptation. This film is yet another example of a poor attempt to transform a well-regarded book into a movie. It failed. I would suggest that fans of the book skip this and I would strongly discourage anyone not familiar with the book from even considering watching this film.
42/100 F | |
|
| |
bobrob2004 DTF1 MODERATOR Detroit Tiger
Number of posts : 10646 Age : 39 Location : Warren, MI Reputation : 12 Registration date : 2007-10-05
| Subject: Re: Lord of the Flies (1963) Sat Mar 07, 2009 4:07 pm | |
| They made a movie out of this? I read the book in high school. | |
|
| |
gs78 Detroit Tiger
Number of posts : 27687 Age : 46 Location : Trashy Park Michigan Favorite Current Tiger(s) : Dontrelle Willis, Brandon Inge, Maggs, Verlander, Granderson, Pudge and Todd Jones Reputation : 9 Registration date : 2007-10-06
| Subject: Re: Lord of the Flies (1963) Sat Mar 07, 2009 4:39 pm | |
| I read the book in school
And seen the movie
The book gets a 67
The movie a 37 | |
|
| |
gs78 Detroit Tiger
Number of posts : 27687 Age : 46 Location : Trashy Park Michigan Favorite Current Tiger(s) : Dontrelle Willis, Brandon Inge, Maggs, Verlander, Granderson, Pudge and Todd Jones Reputation : 9 Registration date : 2007-10-06
| Subject: Re: Lord of the Flies (1963) Sat Mar 07, 2009 4:40 pm | |
| I might have enjoyed the book more if I didn't have to do a paper on it | |
|
| |
gs78 Detroit Tiger
Number of posts : 27687 Age : 46 Location : Trashy Park Michigan Favorite Current Tiger(s) : Dontrelle Willis, Brandon Inge, Maggs, Verlander, Granderson, Pudge and Todd Jones Reputation : 9 Registration date : 2007-10-06
| Subject: Re: Lord of the Flies (1963) Sat Mar 07, 2009 4:40 pm | |
| I got something like a C- | |
|
| |
catbox_9 DTF1 ADMINISTRATOR Detroit Tiger
Number of posts : 22295 Age : 37 Location : Paso Robles, California Favorite Current Tiger(s) : Justin Verlander Reputation : 17 Registration date : 2007-10-05
| Subject: Re: Lord of the Flies (1963) Sat Mar 07, 2009 11:31 pm | |
| - bobrob2004 wrote:
- They made a movie out of this? I read the book in high school.
There's a newer movie, too (from 1990ish). We didn't read it in high school. I read it last week. | |
|
| |
catbox_9 DTF1 ADMINISTRATOR Detroit Tiger
Number of posts : 22295 Age : 37 Location : Paso Robles, California Favorite Current Tiger(s) : Justin Verlander Reputation : 17 Registration date : 2007-10-05
| Subject: Re: Lord of the Flies (1963) Sat Mar 07, 2009 11:35 pm | |
| - gs78 wrote:
- I read the book in school
And seen the movie
The book gets a 67
The movie a 37 Score logged. I'd give the book more like an 85. I didn't write a paper on it though so that helps. Reading should never be forced - it always sucks that way. | |
|
| |
gs78 Detroit Tiger
Number of posts : 27687 Age : 46 Location : Trashy Park Michigan Favorite Current Tiger(s) : Dontrelle Willis, Brandon Inge, Maggs, Verlander, Granderson, Pudge and Todd Jones Reputation : 9 Registration date : 2007-10-06
| Subject: Re: Lord of the Flies (1963) Tue Mar 10, 2009 8:19 pm | |
| - catbox_9 wrote:
- gs78 wrote:
- I read the book in school
And seen the movie
The book gets a 67
The movie a 37 Score logged. I'd give the book more like an 85. I didn't write a paper on it though so that helps.
Reading should never be forced - it always sucks that way. Exactly I don't think there is a single book that I was forced to do a report on in high school or college that is one my bookshelf now | |
|
| |
catbox_9 DTF1 ADMINISTRATOR Detroit Tiger
Number of posts : 22295 Age : 37 Location : Paso Robles, California Favorite Current Tiger(s) : Justin Verlander Reputation : 17 Registration date : 2007-10-05
| Subject: Re: Lord of the Flies (1963) Wed Mar 11, 2009 12:07 am | |
| - gs78 wrote:
- catbox_9 wrote:
- gs78 wrote:
- I read the book in school
And seen the movie
The book gets a 67
The movie a 37 Score logged. I'd give the book more like an 85. I didn't write a paper on it though so that helps.
Reading should never be forced - it always sucks that way.
Exactly
I don't think there is a single book that I was forced to do a report on in high school or college that is one my bookshelf now Remember how bad Shakespeare was in high school? Remember how bad it still is? | |
|
| |
bobrob2004 DTF1 MODERATOR Detroit Tiger
Number of posts : 10646 Age : 39 Location : Warren, MI Reputation : 12 Registration date : 2007-10-05
| |
| |
gs78 Detroit Tiger
Number of posts : 27687 Age : 46 Location : Trashy Park Michigan Favorite Current Tiger(s) : Dontrelle Willis, Brandon Inge, Maggs, Verlander, Granderson, Pudge and Todd Jones Reputation : 9 Registration date : 2007-10-06
| Subject: Re: Lord of the Flies (1963) Wed Mar 11, 2009 8:50 pm | |
| - catbox_9 wrote:
- gs78 wrote:
- catbox_9 wrote:
- gs78 wrote:
- I read the book in school
And seen the movie
The book gets a 67
The movie a 37 Score logged. I'd give the book more like an 85. I didn't write a paper on it though so that helps.
Reading should never be forced - it always sucks that way.
Exactly
I don't think there is a single book that I was forced to do a report on in high school or college that is one my bookshelf now Remember how bad Shakespeare was in high school? Remember how bad it still is? Nice to know some things stay the same | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Lord of the Flies (1963) | |
| |
|
| |
| Lord of the Flies (1963) | |
|