| To Have and Have Not (1944) | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
catbox_9 DTF1 ADMINISTRATOR Detroit Tiger
Number of posts : 22295 Age : 37 Location : Paso Robles, California Favorite Current Tiger(s) : Justin Verlander Reputation : 17 Registration date : 2007-10-05
| Subject: To Have and Have Not (1944) Mon Jun 09, 2008 1:15 am | |
| More Bogart and Bacall, their first film together. | |
|
| |
catbox_9 DTF1 ADMINISTRATOR Detroit Tiger
Number of posts : 22295 Age : 37 Location : Paso Robles, California Favorite Current Tiger(s) : Justin Verlander Reputation : 17 Registration date : 2007-10-05
| Subject: Re: To Have and Have Not (1944) Mon Jun 09, 2008 3:32 am | |
| All right. This was pretty good. This is a story much like Casablanca. Bogart is an American in a foreign land during World War II and there's a girl he loves that he tries to ship back to the US. I've never heard of a critic calling this better than Casablanca so I probably need to rewatch that particular film as I no longer have the flu. I found this movie's plot to be rather engaging and quite interesting.
The acting in here was top-notch as well. You know you can't go wrong with Bogart, and you don't. He's his usual self. He's still not The Maltese Falcon or The African Queen good, but he's still quite good. Of the three films I've seen so far, this is easily Lauren Bacall's best performance. This is her film debut and what a debut it is. She gives a very good performance. Lastly, while not a star, perhaps my favorite actor in this was Walter Brennan. He's basically just a drunk, but he does a great job at it and you really get to like his character quite a bit.
As I previously mentioned, this film borrows some ideas from Casablanca. It's set in another continent and quite different, but the similarities are there. Bogart is an American mixed up in a foreign land during War. He spends most of his time at a drinking establishment and there's a reasonably important character who plays a piano. Since this movie came out a couple of years after Casablanca and has so many similarities I'll have to deduct a few points, but that doesn't mean this film isn't quite good nonetheless.
85/100 B
UP NEXT: The final, and most well-regarded, Bogart and Bacall movie - The Big Sleep. | |
|
| |
laprimamirala Detroit Tiger
Number of posts : 14194 Age : 62 Location : SE Michigan Favorite Current Tiger(s) : Magglio........:) Reputation : 11 Registration date : 2007-10-29
| Subject: Re: To Have and Have Not (1944) Sun Jun 15, 2008 2:40 pm | |
| It was the 1940s version of Mr. and Mrs. Smith.... | |
|
| |
catbox_9 DTF1 ADMINISTRATOR Detroit Tiger
Number of posts : 22295 Age : 37 Location : Paso Robles, California Favorite Current Tiger(s) : Justin Verlander Reputation : 17 Registration date : 2007-10-05
| Subject: Re: To Have and Have Not (1944) Sun Jun 15, 2008 5:58 pm | |
| - laprimamirala wrote:
- It was the 1940s version of Mr. and Mrs. Smith....
The 1940s version of the 1940s Hitchcock version or the inferior 2000s version with Pitt and Jolie? | |
|
| |
laprimamirala Detroit Tiger
Number of posts : 14194 Age : 62 Location : SE Michigan Favorite Current Tiger(s) : Magglio........:) Reputation : 11 Registration date : 2007-10-29
| Subject: Re: To Have and Have Not (1944) Sun Jun 15, 2008 6:01 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
catbox_9 DTF1 ADMINISTRATOR Detroit Tiger
Number of posts : 22295 Age : 37 Location : Paso Robles, California Favorite Current Tiger(s) : Justin Verlander Reputation : 17 Registration date : 2007-10-05
| Subject: Re: To Have and Have Not (1944) Sun Jun 15, 2008 6:07 pm | |
| - laprimamirala wrote:
- The latter
I sort of saw that one once but didn't really pay any attention. I still need to see Hitchcock's version although the reviews say it's one of his worst films. | |
|
| |
laprimamirala Detroit Tiger
Number of posts : 14194 Age : 62 Location : SE Michigan Favorite Current Tiger(s) : Magglio........:) Reputation : 11 Registration date : 2007-10-29
| Subject: Re: To Have and Have Not (1944) Sun Jun 15, 2008 6:18 pm | |
| Basically, I was referring to the heat generated between the two stars! | |
|
| |
catbox_9 DTF1 ADMINISTRATOR Detroit Tiger
Number of posts : 22295 Age : 37 Location : Paso Robles, California Favorite Current Tiger(s) : Justin Verlander Reputation : 17 Registration date : 2007-10-05
| Subject: Re: To Have and Have Not (1944) Sun Jun 15, 2008 8:51 pm | |
| - laprimamirala wrote:
- Basically, I was referring to the heat generated between the two stars!
Oh, okay. Yeah I was going to say they weren't assassins in this movie. | |
|
| |
laprimamirala Detroit Tiger
Number of posts : 14194 Age : 62 Location : SE Michigan Favorite Current Tiger(s) : Magglio........:) Reputation : 11 Registration date : 2007-10-29
| Subject: Re: To Have and Have Not (1944) Sun Jun 15, 2008 8:57 pm | |
| Each of these was both couples' first movie as "an item" which makes the performances all the more endearing.
Have you seen the 1938 Robin Hood flick yet? | |
|
| |
catbox_9 DTF1 ADMINISTRATOR Detroit Tiger
Number of posts : 22295 Age : 37 Location : Paso Robles, California Favorite Current Tiger(s) : Justin Verlander Reputation : 17 Registration date : 2007-10-05
| Subject: Re: To Have and Have Not (1944) Sun Jun 15, 2008 9:56 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
laprimamirala Detroit Tiger
Number of posts : 14194 Age : 62 Location : SE Michigan Favorite Current Tiger(s) : Magglio........:) Reputation : 11 Registration date : 2007-10-29
| Subject: Re: To Have and Have Not (1944) Sun Jun 15, 2008 9:59 pm | |
| ah, well! It will be somthing to look foward to! | |
|
| |
catbox_9 DTF1 ADMINISTRATOR Detroit Tiger
Number of posts : 22295 Age : 37 Location : Paso Robles, California Favorite Current Tiger(s) : Justin Verlander Reputation : 17 Registration date : 2007-10-05
| Subject: Re: To Have and Have Not (1944) Sun Jun 15, 2008 10:05 pm | |
| Yeah! I do want to see it but there's just so many movies to see. I'm home for a week+ right now so I'm not watching many movies. I'll get back to work a week from tomorrow. | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: To Have and Have Not (1944) | |
| |
|
| |
| To Have and Have Not (1944) | |
|